Achen, C. (1978). Measuring representation. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 475–510.
Adams, J. (2001). Party competition and responsible party government: A theory of spatial competition based upon insights from behavioral voting research. University of Michigan Press.
Bafumi, J., & Herron, M. (2010). Leapfrog representation and extremism: A study of American voters and their members in congress. American Political Science Review, 104, 519–542.
Barnes, L., Blumenau, J., & Lauderdale, B. (forthcoming). Measuring attitudes towards public spending using a multivariate tax summary experiment. American Journal of Political Science.
Bartels, L. (2008). Unequal democracy. Russell Sage Foundation.
Bartels, L. M. (2015). The social welfare deficit: Public opinion, policy responsiveness, and political inequality in affluent democracies. Unpublished manuscript.
Bartle, J., Dellepiane-Avellaneda, S., & McGann, A. (2019). Policy accommodation versus electoral turnover: Policy representation in Britain, 1945–2015. Journal of Public Policy, 39(2), 235–265.
Bartle, J., Dellepiane-Avellaneda, S., & Stimson, J. (2011). The moving centre: Preferences for government activity in Britain, 1950–2005. British Journal of Political Science, 41(2), 259–285.
Bashir, O. (2015). Testing inferences about American politics: A review of the “oligarchy” result. Research and Politics, 2(4), 1–7.
Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (2005). The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. University of Chicago Press.
Bélanger, E., & Pétry, F. (2005). The rational public? A Canadian test of the Page and Shapiro argument. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 190–212.
Berkman, M., & Plutzer, E. (2005). Ten thousand democracies. Georgetown University Press.
Bonica, A. (2015). Measuring public spending preferences using an interactive budgeting questionnaire. Research & Politics, 2(2), 1–9.
Branham, A. J., Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien, C. (2017). When do the rich win?Political Science Quarterly, 132(1), 43–62.
Broockman, D. E. (2016). Approaches to studying political representation. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 41, 181–215.
Broockman, D. E., & Skovron, C. (2018). Bias in perceptions of public opinion among political elites. American Political Science Review, 112(3), 542–563.
Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (2007). Why welfare states persist: Public opinion and the future of social provision. University of Chicago Press.
Brooks, J. (1987). The opinion–policy nexus in France: Do institutions and ideology make a difference? Journal of Politics, 49, 465–480.
Buchanan, R., Dias, M., & Wlezien, C. (forthcoming). On collective representation. In T. Rudolph (Ed.), Handbook of politics and public opinion. Edward Elgar.
Budge, I., McDonald, M., Pennings, P., & Keman, K. (2012). Organizing democratic choice: Party representation over time. Oxford University Press.
Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40.
Butler, D., & Nickerson, D. (2011). Can learning constituency opinion affect how legislators vote? Results from a field experiment. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 6, 55–83.
Camobreco, J. F., & Barnello, M. A. (2008). Democratic responsiveness and policy shock: The case of abortion policy. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 8(1), 48–65.
Carsey, T., & Harden, J. (2010). New measures of partisanship, ideology, and policy mood in the American states. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 10(2), 136–156.
Caughey, D., & Warshaw, C. (2018). Policy preference and policy change: Dynamic responsiveness in the American states, 1936–2014. American Political Science Review, 112(2), 249–266.
Converse, P. E., & Pierce, R. (1986). Political representation in France. Harvard University Press.
Cox, G. W. (1987). The efficient secret: The cabinet and the development of political parties in Victorian England. Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.
Dalton, R., Farrell, D., & McAllister, I. (2011). Political parties and democratic linkage. Oxford University Press.
Dassonneville, R., Feitosa, F., Hooghe, M., & Oser, J. (2021). Policy responsiveness to all citizens or only to voters? A longitudinal analysis of policy responsiveness in OECD countries. European Journal of Political Research, 60(3), 583–602.
D’Attoma, J., Tuxhorn, K.-L., & Steinmo, S. (2018). Measuring budgetary preferences using interactive budget simulations: A holistic approach. Unpublished manuscript.
Devine, D. J. (1970). The attentive public: Polyarchical democracy. Rand McNally.
Druckman, J. N., & Jacobs, L. R. (2006). Lumpers and splitters: The public opinion information that politicians collect and use. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 453–476.
Eichenberg, R., & Stoll, R. (2003). Representing defence: Democratic control of the defence budget in the United States and Western Europe. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47, 399–423.
Elkjær, M. A., & Iversen, T. (2020). The political representation of economic interests: Subversion of democracy or middle-class supremacy?World Politics, 72(2), 254–290.
Elkjær, M. A., & Klitgaard, M. B. (forthcoming). Economic inequality and political responsiveness: A systematic review. Perspectives on Politics.
Ellis, C., & Stimson, J. A. (2012). Ideology in America. Cambridge University Press.
Enns, P. (2015). Relative policy support and coincidental representation. Perspectives on Politics, 13, 1053–1064.
Enns, P., Kelly, N., Morgan, J., Volscho, T., & Witko, C. (2014). Conditional status quo bias and top income shares: How US political institutions have benefited the rich. Journal of Politics, 76(2), 289–303.
Enns, P., & Wlezien, C. (Eds.). (2011). Who gets represented? Russell Sage Foundation.
Erikson, R. S., MacKuen, M. B., & Stimson, J. A. (2002). The macro polity. Cambridge University Press.
Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., & McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. Cambridge University Press.
Fenno, R. F., Jr. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts. Little, Brown.
Franklin, M., & Wlezien, C. (1997). The responsive public: Issue salience, policy change, and preferences for European unification. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 9, 347–363.
Geer, J. G. (1996). From tea leaves to opinion polls: A theory of democratic leadership. Columbia University Press.
Gilens, M. (2012). Affluence and influence. Princeton University Press.
Gilens, M., & Page, B. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12, 564–581.
Golder, M., & Stramski, J. (2010). Ideological congruence and electoral institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 90–106.
Griffin, J. D. (2006). Electoral competition and democratic responsiveness: A defense of the marginality hypothesis. Journal of Politics, 68, 909–919.
Griffin, J. D., & Newman, B. (2005). Are voters better represented? Journal of Politics, 67, 1206–1227.
Hakhverdian, A. (2010). Political representation and its mechanisms: A dynamic left–right approach for the United Kingdom, 1976–2006. British Journal of Political Science, 40(4), 835–856.
Hansen, J. M. (1998). Individuals, institutions, and public preferences over public finance. American Political Science Review, 92(3), 513–531.
Hiaeshutter-Rice, D., Soroka, S., & Wlezien, C. (2021). Freedom of the press and public responsiveness. Perspectives on Politics, 19(2), 479–491.
Hill, K. Q., & Hurley, P. A. (2003). Beyond the demand–input model: A theory of representational linkages. Journal of Politics, 65(2), 304–326.
Hobolt, S. B., & Klemmensen, R. (2005). Responsive government? Public opinion and policy preferences in Britain and Denmark. Political Studies, 53, 379–402.
Hobolt, S. B., & Klemmensen, R. (2008). Government responsiveness and political competition in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 309–337.
Jacobs, L. R., & Shapiro, R. Y. (2000). Politicians don’t pander: Political manipulation and the loss of democratic responsiveness. University of Chicago Press.
Jennings, W. (2009). The public thermostat, political responsiveness and error correction: Border control and asylum in Britain, 1994–2007. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 847–870.
Jennings, W., & John, P. (2009). The dynamics of political attention: Public opinion and the Queen’s Speech in the United Kingdom, 1960–2001. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 838–854.
Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. HarperCollins.
Klüver, H., & Pickup, M. (2019). Are they listening? Public opinion, interest groups and government responsiveness. West European Politics, 42(1), 91–112.
Kolln, A.-K., & Wlezien, C. (2016). Measuring public preferences for government spending under constraints: A conjoint-analytic approach. Unpublished manuscript.
Lax, J. R., & Phillips, J. H. (2012). The democratic deficit in the states. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 148–166.
Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Pattern of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries. Yale University Press.
Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57(1), 45–56.
Miller, W. E., Pierce, R., Thomassen, J., Herrera, R., Holmberg, S., Esaisson, P., & Webels, B. (1999). Policy representation in Western democracies. Oxford University Press.
Moniz, P., & Wlezien, C. (2020). Issue salience and political decisions. In D. Redlawsk (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Political Decision-Making. Oxford University Press.
Monroe, A. (1998). Public opinion and public policy 1980–1993. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 6–28.
Neuner, F. G., N. Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien, C. (2019). Mass media as a source of public responsiveness. International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(3), 269–292.
Pacheco, J. (2013). The thermostatic model of responsiveness in the American states. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 13, 306–332.
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77, 175–190.
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. University of Chicago Press.
Peters, Y., & Ensink, S. (2015). Differential responsiveness in Europe: The effects of preference difference and electoral participation. West European Politics, 38(3), 577–600.
Petry, F. (1999). The opinion–policy relationship in Canada. Journal of Politics, 61, 540–550.
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
Powell, G. B. (2000). Elections as instruments of democracy: Majoritarian and proportional views. Yale University Press.
Rasmussen, A., Reher, S., & Toshkov, D. (2019). The opinion–policy nexus in Europe and the role of political institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 58(2), 412–434.
Rigby, E., & Wright, G. C. (2011). Whose statehouse democracy? Policy responsiveness to poor versus rich constituents in poor versus rich states. In P. Enns & C. Wlezien (Eds.), Who gets represented? (pp. 189–222). Russell Sage Foundation.
Rigby, E., & Wright, G. C. (2013). Political parties and representation of the poor in the American states. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 552–565.
Riker, W. (1982). Liberalism against populism. W. H. Freeman.
Sevenans, J., Soontjens, K., & Walgrave, S. (forthcoming). Inequality in the public priority perceptions of elected representatives. West European Politics.
Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien, C. (2008). On the limits to inequality in representation. PS: Political Science and Politics, 41, 319–327.
Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien, C. (2010). Degrees of democracy: Politics, public opinion and policy. Cambridge University Press.
Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien, C. (2015). The majoritarian and proportional visions and democratic responsiveness. Electoral Studies, 40, 539–547.
Stimson, J. A., MacKuen, M. B., & Erikson, R. S. (1995). Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review, 89, 543–565.
Strom, K. (2003). Parliamentary democracy and delegation. In K. Strøm, W. C. Müller, & T. Bergman (Eds.), Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies (pp. 55–106). Oxford University Press.
Tausanovitch, C., & Warshaw, C. (2014). Representation in municipal government. American Political Science Review, 108(3), 605–641.
Weissberg, R. (1976). Public opinion and popular government. Prentice-Hall.
Weissberg, R. (1978). Collective vs. dyadic representation in Congress. American Political Science Review, 72, 535–547.
Williams, C. J., & Schoonvelde, M. (2018). It takes three: How mass media coverage conditions public responsiveness to policy outputs in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 99(5), 1627–1636.
Wlezien, C. (1995). The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 981–1000.
Wlezien, C. (2004). Patterns of representation: Dynamics of public preferences and policy. Journal of Politics, 66, 1–24.
Wlezien, C. (2005). On the salience of political issues: The problem with “most important problem.” Electoral Studies, 24(4), 555–579.
Wlezien, C. (2017). Public opinion and policy representation: On conceptualization, measurement, and interpretation. Policy Studies Journal, 45(4), 561–582.
Wlezien, C., & Soroka, S. N. (2011). Inequality in policy responsiveness? In P. Enns & C. Wlezien (Eds.), Who gets represented? (pp. 289–310). Russell Sage Foundation.
Wlezien, C., & Soroka, S. (2012). Political institutions and the opinion–policy link. West European Politics, 35(6), 1407–1432.
Wright, G. C., & Berkman, M. B. (1986). Candidates and policy in U.S. senatorial elections. American Political Science Review, 80, 576–590.
